LightBlog

jeudi 17 novembre 2016

OnePlus Discontinues Sales of the OnePlus 3 in the US and Europe

Earlier this week we saw the official introduction of the OnePlus 3T. OnePlus has decided to release a new phone with improved specs that will likely help keep sales alive until the launch of the OnePlus 4. The OnePlus 3T has a larger battery capacity, an improved front-facing camera (at 16MP), the option for 128GB of internal storage, the Snapdragon 821 SoC from Qualcomm and even some sapphire glass protecting the rear camera.

For anyone who has waited until the holiday season to purchase a new smartphone, the new OnePlus 3T is easily among the best available. Leading up to the launch of the OnePlus 3T, many noticed that the original OnePlus 3 was out of stock on OnePlus' website. Some were hoping that this would be a temporary thing, and that the company would eventually offer both the OnePlus 3 and the OnePlus 3T at the same time.

Android Authority reached out to OnePlus to confirm again if this was the case, and they received some bad news. Depending on where you live, it's been confirmed that the OnePlus 3 will no longer be available for sale again. OnePlus told Android Authority that they would be discontinuing sales in both the United States as well as European market. They were also told that OnePlus didn't have any future plans to bring it back for these specific reasons.

We did report on the OnePlus 3 being discontinued in our own exclusive article. The OnePlus 3 had reached its end of life in terms of official availability. It is good to get more confirmation on the regions immediately affected by this move.

Interestingly enough, they didn't specify any other countries. So the OnePlus 3 could still be made available in countries like India and China. We're also seeing a healthy resale market for the OnePlus 3 over on Swappa right now. The last one was sold in October and went for just over $400. So if you currently own the OnePlus 3, you could put it up for sale on Swappa and use those funds to buy a newer OnePlus 3T device.

Source: Android Authority



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2f7V4b4
via IFTTT

Qualcomm Announces Quick Charge 4.0 Technology

At an event in New York, Qualcomm has taken the wraps off of its latest advancement in charging technology: Quick Charge 4.0. Building upon the success of preceding Quick Charge technologies, Quick Charge 4.0 promises to deliver even faster charge times and greater efficiency levels, so that mobile consumers spend less time hugging the wall.

Qualcomm found that three of the top four concerns for people when looking for a new smartphone were related to either battery capacity or battery charging speed, and they are aiming to utilize Quick Charge 4.0 to continue improving their strong market position, with over 150 companies supporting Quick Charge, by helping assuage those fears.

Qualcomm Quick Charge 4.0Quick Charge 4.0 claims to extend smartphone use for flagship smartphones with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 chip by 5 hours with only 5 minutes of charging, going "5 for 5" according to Qualcomm. With just 15 minutes of charging time, a 2,750 mAh battery is expected to be able to go from 0% to 50% charge.

Qualcomm is once again improving their Dual Charge parallel charging technology (now called "Dual Charge++") to provide up to 20% faster charging and 30% higher efficiency at up to 5 degrees celsius cooler temperatures compared to Quick Charge 3.0, which itself featured improvements over the predecessor technologies.

Quick Charge 4.0 also features the third release of Qualcomm's INOV (Intelligent Negotiation for Optimum Voltage) power management algorithm. This release of INOV includes real-time thermal management, which Qualcomm says is a technology industry first. INOV 3.0 focuses on optimization by determining and selecting optimal power transfer level for the thermal conditions present.

A major point of focus for Quick Charge 4.0 has been on improving the safety and protection features, with multiple additional layers of protection added to help prevent battery over-charging. Quick Charge 4.0 keeps many of the existing features such as the 3 layers of over-voltage protection, 3 layers of over-current protection, and 4 layers  of over-temp protection, and supplements them with new features such as the ability to detect the quality and condition of the cable being used.

One of the most important changes though is the addition of compatibility with USB Power Delivery (USB PD), which could not have come at a better time, following closely on the heels of Google "strongly recommend[ing]" that devices only support charging methods that are compatible with USB PD in the new Android 7.0 Compatibility Document (with a little hint that Google "might REQUIRE all type-C devices to support full interoperability with standard type-C chargers" in the future).

Fast Charging is one of the top features driving next phone purchase Quick Charge 4 a superset of USB PD with many benefits Quick Charge Methodology Comprehensive Quick Charge 4 Safety Enhancements Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Charging Advancements

For the best QC 4.0 performance, Qualcomm is also introducing two new power management ICs, the SMB1380 and SMB1381. These PMIC are engineered for low impedance, with up to 95% peak efficiency, and support for advanced features like battery differential sensing. The SMB3180/1 will be made available by the end of 2016.

Qualcomm's Quick Charge 4.0 fast charging technology will be available in the next generation of Qualcomm Snapdragon processors, starting with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 835. The Snapdragon 835 is expected to ship in commercial devices beginning in the first half of 2017.


What are your thoughts on Qualcomm's Quick Charge 4.0? Let us know in the comments below!

 



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2fIqa7B
via IFTTT

Snapdragon 835 Announced on Samsung 10nm FinFET Process for Early 2017

Despite a lukewarm performance for most of 2015, Qualcomm has largely had a successful 2016 thus far thanks to its Snapdragon 820/821. While the 820/821 struggled against some of its competitors in benchmarks, the current crop of Snapdragon SoCs has largely satisfied the needs of end users.

Devices such as the OnePlus 3 have garnered highly favorable reviews among the XDA team, to say nothing of the immense popularity of the Google Pixel and Pixel XL on the Android community at large. But Qualcomm isn't interested in releasing merely "satisfactory" products, and as such the company has officially announced the successor to the Snapdragon 820 and 821 – the long awaited Snapdragon 835. Although many rumors claimed otherwise, Qualcomm appears to skipping over the Snapdragon 830 name, at least for now.

While not much is yet known about the Snapdragon 835, Qualcomm did at least reveal they would be continuing their partnership with Samsung. The Snapdragon 835 will be built using GlobalFoundries/Samsung's process technology and fabrication plants, and will be Qualcomm's first chip based on Samsung's new 10 nanometer FinFET process. Samsung is quite proud to be the first manufacturer to offer mass production of 10 nm chips, however, TSMC is close on their heels with their own 10 nm process which will be found in the upcoming MediaTek Helio X30. There are also some questions about the validity of measuring process technology by nominal feature size (with Gate Pitch x Metal Pitch being held up as a preferable measurement by Intel, a measure wherein Intel 14 nm ranks fairly closely with TSMC and Samsung/GloFo 10 nm), but that is a topic for another time.

Samsung's 10 nanometer FinFET process is expected to bring a 30% increase in area efficiency and a choice of 27% higher performance at the same power usage or 40% lower power consumption at the same performance level (or somewhere in-between). That 30% increase in area efficiency is a major focus for Qualcomm at the moment, as it will leave OEMs with more room inside their devices to incorporate other parts, such as a larger battery. Qualcomm especially hopes to see manufacturers take advantage of the increased area efficiency by incorporating a larger battery. The company is stressing all across its announcements that they hope to eliminate range anxiety. Qualcomm wants you to charge more quickly with Quick Charge 4.0, consume less power with newer and more efficient chipsets, and create room for larger batteries inside of phones with smaller processors and other components.

Snapdragon 835 10 nm FinFET Announcement Picture

In addition to the unveiling of the Snapdragon 835's manufacturing process, it was also previously announced that the Snapdragon 835 will be carrying Qualcomm's new X16 LTE Modem, which is capable of Gigabit download speeds.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 is already in production, and should begin shipping in flagship phones during the first half of 2017, just in time for the much anticipated flagship refreshes (and just as rumors are starting to appear for the Samsung Galaxy S8, LG G6, HTC 11, and various other devices).


Do you think Qualcomm can leverage Samsung's 10nm process to regain the top spot in CPU performance? Will OEMs follow through with Qualcomm's goals of better battery life, or will they just use the power savings to shrink devices even further? Let us know in the comments below!



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2fIrXt7
via IFTTT

Qualcomm Announces Bug Bounty Program

Bug bounty programs are by no means a new idea for the tech industry. They have proven to be highly successful for many companies, giving them opportunities to employ the power of the crowd to find critical bugs and flaws, and Qualcomm is now looking to get in on the fun too.

Qualcomm is launching their "vulnerability rewards program" with a specific focus on Qualcomm Snapdragon processors (such as the newly announced Snapdragon 835) and LTE Modems. Qualcomm is stressing that their bug bounty is unique and different from those of other major silicon vendors, in part because of their focus on the community. Not only will there be rewards of up to $15,000 USD per vulnerability, but Qualcomm will also be honoring members that make particularly interesting discoveries with recognition through QTI Product Security and/or CodeAuroraForum's Hall of Fame, depending on the vulnerability in question.

The program will start off as a closed program, with only 40 security researchers that have made previous vulnerability disclosures regarding Qualcomm products being invited. If it proves to be successful, it may grow quickly and prove to be a major asset for Qualcomm.

Qualcomm's bug bounty program will be administered with the HackerOne vulnerability coordination platform. For more details, visit http://ift.tt/2gjKVtX and http://ift.tt/2f3Bsl8.

And of course, there won't be any need to wait to disclose bugs until everything gets set up, as the program is effective immediately.

This is a commendable initiative from Qualcomm seeing how we come across more and more exploits surfacing every passing week. A rewards program not only gives them more eyes to examine their hardware and software stacks, it also gives security researchers and enthusiasts an incentive to keep putting the newest technologies and codes to test. The end beneficiary is the user who enjoys a much safer and more secure mobile experience.



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2gjK1gS
via IFTTT

mercredi 16 novembre 2016

Interview with Zack Zhang from Honor: The Millennial Demographic, Huawei’s Technology Pool, EMUI and Lessons Learned

Recently XDA Editor-in-Chief Mario Serrafero sat down with Zack Zhang, Vice President of Honor USA to discuss the differences between Honor and Huawei, how the two companies share technology and how their pricing structure is affected by the choice to sell devices primarily online. Also covered was EMUI, Kirin processors and how Honor is helping developers and the community.


Mario Serrafero: So, what phone are you using now?

Zack Zhang: The Honor 8, of course!

Mario Serrafero: Yes, you've read my review, it's a really good device. I always carry two phones, and it's my second phone. If you weren't using the Honor 8, if you had to use a non-Honor device, which one would you use?

Zack Zhang: Hmm… I don't know. I've only used Honor devices lately. I test other competitor's devices, but I don't really use them. I just have a look and do a comparison. I have been using just Honor or Huawei brands for several years, but no others in that time. I am constantly testing phones from other companies though. For example, I'll take one device for a week or two to test it, just like you, but not for longer. So it's hard to say. I've tried many devices, some are from our competitors OnePlus, and ZTE, and Samsung, and the iPhone. I can hardly say which one I would choose — constantly trying new ones though.

Mario Serrafero: Would you say that allows you to learn from other manufacturers? See what they're doing, and get a feel for what people want?

Zack Zhang: Yes, that's right. I try other devices to try to see what their advantages are. I look at both hardware and software to try to see what they are doing better than us, and where we can improve our devices. This is why I try other companies' devices.

Mario Serrafero: Cool. That was a bit of a warm up question. Something that I've seen a lot of people get confused about, even some people in the media, is the distinction between Honor and Huawei. Now Huawei is of course the parent company, but what would you say is the main difference, what would you want people to know is different, between Honor and Huawei?

"Honor is more focused. We focus on young guys, especially internet savvy consumers."

Zack Zhang: Huawei is a brand that is for everybody. You can see that Huawei is in part for the very young people, maybe 15 or 16 years old, but also for older people. Even 70 year olds and older can all use Huawei devices. They try to have something for everybody.

They also have some different niches like the Mate series which is more targeted at business professionals. The P series is more focused on design and photography. And the Nova series is for young ladies. So, as you can see, Huawei tries to cover everybody. But Honor is more focused. We focus on young guys, especially internet savvy consumers. The narrower focus is a major difference.

Mario Serrafero: Right. And do you, the lead of Honor, want people to associate Honor devices with Huawei at all, or do you think that in the consumer mind, they should be distinct entities for this very reason that you just told us?

Zack Zhang: Yeah, I think it's better. In our mind, when we communicate about the brand, we separate it. For Honor, it is totally separate from the Huawei group. Because for Honor, it's really a brand that people will say "I like the Honor brand. The product they have, the way they're thinking, and the way they communicate", which is a different way of living. I'll give you an example. For a Huawei device, people can buy the device anywhere in a store, in the supermarket, everywhere. But for Honor, it is more limited. We're more focused on ecommerce. You can buy the device on our shopping mall, you can buy it on Amazon and the phones are much cheaper and it's cheaper despite that the quality is still the same. Actually some parts are even priced higher than the Huawei devices, as you know, if you compare the Honor 8 and the P9, the P9 is much more expensive than the Honor 8, but the Honor 8 still outperforms it in certain areas.

"The Honor 8 has 4GB of RAM, but some models of the P9 only have 3 GB. Everything else is almost the same. One with Leica branding, one without."

 The Honor 8 has 4GB of RAM,  but some models of the P9 only have 3 GB. Everything else is almost the same. One with Leica branding, one without. So, that is a difference there, but the Honor 8 is also much cheaper. The price gap actually comes from two parts. One is sales channels: for Huawei, Samsung, Apple, all those brands, when they sell the device, they are using the highest margin channels to sell them. But for us, we are just focused on online sales. We're using the internet sales to calculate the price. So that is part of where the gap comes from. The second part is that Honor spreads by word of mouth. By our reputation. With Huawei, Samsung, and all the other brands, they are doing 360 degree communication. You can see a lot of advertisement on TV, on billboards, on all the other things. Of course, maybe you'll say that in the U.S. that is different, because currently Huawei is still small. We're also not that big in the U.S., but actually, worldwide you can see that Huawei is similar to Samsung and Apple. Doing all that marketing, everywhere you can see the advertisements. So that's the second big difference. The two biggest differences already make a lot of things different, especially in terms of price. So even with the same quality and specs, the Honor device is much much cheaper compared to Huawei, Samsung, and other companies. And we give credit to the Internet advancements. Even now there are still a lot of people that are not going to go to the internet to buy a smartphone. Without touching it… They're afraid of [purchasing that way]. And that's how Samsung and Huawei do their business. And Honor is definitely not the smartphone for those people. Honor is for the people who understand the industry and the technology. It's for people who know a lot about technology and quality and details.

Mario Serrafero: It's the Android enthusiasts and internet millennial type of crowd.

Zack Zhang: Yes, so we're just targeting them to give them the best offer, best service, best device, best price. And also, another big difference is for Honor, when we do communication, we always believe that the engagement with the consumer is most important and not only social media. Because what the Internet offers to us is most importantly is lower price, but it also offers two-way communication. A traditional advertisement is just one way, top-down. And there's no way to return information to the brand. So even currently, you can see when Samsung will do it, their advertisements are just one way. So they'll do some premium ones, but there is no feedback, no engagement. So we think that the young people, the younger generation, they like to be respected. So all of the communication that Honor engages in is two-way. When we do something or say something, we listen to the feedback. And when people give us feedback, we respect it. We will try to make some change. Because young people are innovative. They have some good ideas. And those good ideas can help us a lot. To make the UI better, to better know what they require. I still remember the day that we entered the U.S. market, and we listened to the consumer. And that's also the reason why we are cooperating with the XDA Developers community. Because we know these groups of people know a lot. And because of their feedback we get to know more about the market, and we can make a better product.

Mario Serrafero: One last thing related to quality and consumer feedback, really feedback that shapes the products in general. How much input does Huawei have on your products? We know that you share the UI, UI elements, and the software, and of course the HiSilicon chips, but does Huawei actually make any product design decisions for Honor devices?

Zack Zhang: No, Honor has it's own product team. So Honor will design the common hardware, right? The basic technology is the same. So everything will share the same technology. If one will acquire some new technology, it will be shared. So, like you mentioned, the chipset, we share the same one. The HiSilicon one. And we'll share the platform on the Emotion UI, but it is still different. The Emotion UI for Honor is different from the one for Huawei.

Mario Serrafero: The platform is the same, but tweaked to each demographics' preferences.

Zack Zhang: Yeah, when we acquire the technology, like the fingerprint sensor, or any new technology, it is placed in the "pool". There is a of pool this technology, and either Huawei or Honor devices can use that technology, they can pick it up by themselves. But the decision comes from  the design team. When the design team is designing the device, they are using the shared resources — but the design of the devices come from separate teams.

"When we acquire the technology, it is placed in the "pool". There is a pool of this technology, and either Huawei or Honor devices can use that technology"

Mario Serrafero: That's a really good way to put it. They share the resources, and they can pick and choose. Ok, so moving on to a bit of a more controversial topic, as far as the product goes, people love Honor hardware. It's unequivocally good. It's objectively good hardware, especially for the price. HiSilicon chips are some of the fastest as far as CPU goes, and the GPU is catching up as well. The camera is great. It's a really compelling piece of hardware… but what I've noticed, and what I've also criticized myself is the software. And much of this criticism comes from enthusiast communities, which are more used to (and often prefer) stock Android approaches. How would you say that Honor interprets that criticism?

Zack Zhang: We see that. I actually am always using my own name to sign into the XDA community, and go to the forums to answer some of the questions by consumers. I see that many people are complaining about that, because they are not familiar with the UI. I can understand that, because people already have certain habits, it can be hard to change them. I can currently give you some news: for the new Emotion UI 5.0, there will be a lot of change, like how we are adding the application drawer because a lot of people requested it.

Mario Serrafero: Ok. And how about the system UI? Like the notification panel. Will that be able to be modified to more closely resemble stock Android?

"we are trying to have a deep cooperation with the developer communities."

Zack Zhang: Well, I can tell you that we are trying to have a deep cooperation with the developer communities. And we'll be creating some testers for Emotion UI 5.0 for the Honor 8. So if you're a really interested individual, you can give us your info, and we'll give the preview version to you. And remember, this is a preview version, it is not the final one.
 So we are sending this preview version to various communities and get some testers for it. So when they are trying it and doing the testing, if they find any issue or suggestions, they can let us know and we will try to make it better in the final version of Emotion UI 5.0 for the Honor 8.

Mario Serrafero: Great. Has Honor considered making a stock Android ROM for the devices that is developed in house, and offered on the side? I know that some other companies like OPPO and Sony have offered, or at least attempted, those kind of projects. Whether they have succeeded or not is another story. But has Honor ever considered a project like that?

Zack Zhang: Ok, so this part I'm not so sure, but I think that Emotion UI 5.0 can offer more to consumers.

Mario Serrafero: Is there a timeline for Android 7.0 Nougat and Emotion UI 5.0 for the Honor 8 and the Honor 5X?

Zack Zhang: The final version for Nougat will come together with Emotion UI 5.0.

Mario Serrafero: And can we expect that before the end of the year?

Zack Zhang: I'm not sure. I don't think it can be that fast because when we do the preview version, we will collect some requests from the consumers and based on the opinions we see, we will change it again… and then do some other tests, and then there will be the official launch. Because when we push it to everybody, we need to ensure that it will be stable.

Mario Serrafero: Would you consider an open beta?

Zack Zhang: Maybe there will be an open beta, but we'll see how it's received by enthusiasts first, as communities like XDA's are more professional than the general consumer. We are afraid that when we do an open beta test, maybe something will go wrong. Because it is really a first try for us in the U.S. to do this kind of a preview version. We will need to have a look at what will be the outcome, and I cannot say when the final version will release. If there are a lot of new suggestions that come from the community, we will consider it.

Mario Serrafero: What has Honor learned from its first two US focused devices, the Honor 5X and the Honor 8? How has the reception been? What kind of feedback have you gotten? How are you planning to fine tune the next device for the Western Market?

Zack Zhang: What I found is that generally for both devices, the Honor 5X and the Honor 8, there have been a lot of very good reviews and feedback from the media and consumers, especially on the hardware. I think most people are thinking that the Honor brand is a solid brand which makes a very solid device.

"many of the complaints are that people don't know how to use the Emotion UI."

The quality and the hardware, everything is OK. But as you mentioned, many of the complaints are that people don't know how to use the Emotion UI. Because it is totally different from Google's UI, because there is more customizability compared to a lot of other competitors. But I think it is different tastes. That's not to say that Emotion UI is not a good UI, but actually, Emotion UI is quite successful in China and in Europe. Emotion UI is one of the best already. But we understand that people in different areas have different tastes and different styles. So we're really looking into how to better localize it for each market. And that's the reason that I say that with each step we look at our consumer ideas and what we can do about it. To make it more adapted to the local market. That's one part. The second part is that we think that Honor is a bit of an open brand, unlike the other big ones. So as we say that we are for the young people, so we are trying to incorporate it with some small, not small, not big sized (not like app companies like Facebook, like Twitter, Google), but other middle sized app companies, and we have deep cooperation with them. Launching some fun things and interesting services for the consumer. And this is also another trend. And we hope that these kinds of interesting things will bring more value to the young people. They like to try new things. They like to experience different things. So this is what we are doing. 

Mario Serrafero: Great. As far as the applications, do you mean like pre-installed applications for the device? Such as the type that is commonly referred to as bloatware? Or do you mean stuff available for the Huawei ecosystem for those that choose to opt into…

Zack Zhang: For example, currently we are cooperating with Leap, but we are going with Leap together to US companies to offer more interesting things to students in university. We also make some discounts for them, and we provide multiple choices for them to enjoy some fun things. This is still just the first step. We are coming with more and more of this kind of cooperation, to really give them young people some fun things. And we're also cooperating with some films. With Doctor Strange they are very deep corporations [Dr Strange is using an Honor 7 when he crashes his car]. Actually, we are the official co-sponsor for the premiere of the movie, last week. We will have more and more local events, local cooperation with local companies and resources and content, to give more choice to the consumers.

Mario Serrafero: Going back to the developer community, the Honor 5X came with a Qualcomm chip, and this made it really easy, or at least easier, for people to develop for it. To find easy ways to root and set up customer recoveries for it. But also, develop custom ROMs, particularly stock Android ROMs, and CyanogenMod, and all these things that tinkerers and enthusiasts really love. With the Honor 8, it was different because it had the HiSilicon Kirin processor. Was there a particular reason that the Honor device came with a HiSilicon chip, other than the fact that it is made by Huawei? Was it a matter of performance, of price, a combination, or was there some other particular reason why you avoided other chips, like the Snapdragon 820 or any other flagship chipsets for example.

Zack Zhang: I think that our strategy for the chipset… Kirin chipsets give us more choice compared to the Qualcomm chipset, because it is an in-house brand. For in-house chipsets, it always add a lot of convenience to customize and optimize the battery use because we make the chipset ourselves. So it's a lot easier to make adaptations in the use of the chipset itself. And you are right, for the Qualcomm chipset on the Honor 5X, a lot of consumers liked it, and developers loved the Honor 5X because of the Qualcomm chip. But for the Kirin chipset between us and the XDA Developer community, we're trying to open more resources from our side. I think it would be a very interesting thing, and we are really willing to be more open on the Honor brand. We are willing to have more cooperation with the community, and the developer community. Currently we are discussing with XDA Developers to see what would be the scope. How we can work with each other. I know that it still has a long way to go, but personally I am currently pushing very hard on this part. Because this will be a very interesting thing, that we can do together. Both the XDA community and Honor have plenty of resources for developers. I think that to develop something on the Kirin chipset would be interesting for many developers. A lot of them are wondering, because we are already a top three smartphone brand [Huawei]. Every year there are 120 to I think 140 million smartphones we sell in the overseas market [Huawei]. I think that to develop something on the Kirin chipset would be very interesting for many developers.

"Both the XDA community and Honor have plenty of resources for developers."

Mario Serrafero: Yeah, and I think this is really important too. I think it's really important for both Honor and Huawei to put pressure on HiSilicon to release chipset sources, because of course between Honor and Huawei, there is a huge market share, and a big portion of this shared marketshare is on the Kirin platform. So opening up the Kirin platform to developers. To people that want to not just customize their devices, but also use these devices as development platforms, I think would make both Huawei and Honor phones even more compelling. Especially when you look at the makeup of the processors. Qualcomm has arguably lost some ground, particularly on the performance side where it isn't the leader anymore. And of course Samsung seems like they are never going to open up the Exynos chips. So having the Kirin platform be more open would really strengthen the appeal of Honor and Huawei devices to enthusiasts, to developers, and to a lot of people that are hungry for alternatives. For options.

Zack Zhang: Yeah, we are step by step opening the resources, and that's the reason I say that I drive the program with XDA together. To see how we can work with each other, step by step. I think that it is because Huawei is more global, and Honor is more focused on a younger crowd, so we are very open. We can take the first step with the Honor brand to have the cooperation with developers. And then we can expand to the whole family for the Huawei group. And this is what we are working on.

Mario Serrafero: Great. We'll obviously keep our readers posted on this. I can say that I know from our end, we provided you guys with a bunch of requests, sourced from the developers that we contacted, and I know that you are obviously trying to get it done on your end too. Hopefully we'll have an answer either by the end of the year, or during the first quarter of next year.

Zack Zhang: I think we'll be faster than that. We have already appointed a project team to cooperate with XDA Developers. And we already have the R&D guys, the product design guys already joined the team. So we will begin the discussion with your team members very soon, and you will see the progress. I think that maybe to make some common solution is not that easy, but anyway, let's begin to have discussions.

Mario Serrafero: Absolutely. Well, on behalf of the XDA community, thank you for your efforts, and I hope that it turns out how we are hoping, and gives us the option to customize these devices. Because again, they're great hardware for the price. The platform is really fast. The processor is really fast and there is a huge market share for it. So there's a lot of potential. Speaking of market share and potential, I wanted to touch on the Note 7. The Galaxy Note 7 as you know caused quite the stir when it went up in flames, and had to be recalled from the market. So I wanted to ask two things regarding the vacuum that the Note 7 left in the market. First, how do you guys plan on taking advantage of it? And second, is this going to affect the branding of the Honor Note series in any way because of the shared moniker?

"This is one of the best lessons we have learned from the Samsung Galaxy Note 7."

Zack Zhang: Actually, for Samsung's… accident… with the Note 7, it's really… for us we also feel especially that for a consumer business it's really not an easy thing, and even big companies like Samsung sometimes they will make some mistakes, and it ends up being a disaster.

 So after this happened, we thought very carefully about our own devices. It made us check the details even more thoroughly. To test many many times to make sure that this kind of thing will not happen in our devices. This is one of the best lessons we have learned from the Samsung Galaxy Note 7. We are trying to prevent anything like that from happening with our brand. How? By putting more resources into testing the devices to help detect and prevent any major issues before the launch of a device. And this is what a big company can mean to the consumers. And as I remember to ensure that those devices will not really damage the market. For example, there are a lot of companies when they have an engineering sample or their first manufacturing sample, some will sell it. But for our company, we already destroy them.

Mario Serrafero: Great. Yeah, this is something that I noticed when I interviewed Carl Pei from OnePlus not too long ago, and he also said that it was kind of a reminder that things can go wrong, and when things go wrong, they go very wrong. So it's very interesting to see that the first thing you brought up in this situation is not a market opportunity, but rather a reminder of how important quality assurance and testing is. So I'm glad your company is increasing their resources devoted to testing.

Zack Zhang: Yes, you are absolutely right. We are increasing resources on that part to help ensure that nothing like that will happen to our brand. Because it really is a disaster. For a small company, it is maybe still ok, like OnePlus maybe that's still ok, because their volume still not that big, but for companies like Huawei, Samsung, that every year sell around 140 million devices, that would really be a big disaster. Especially when you go to the airport, and you're seeing everywhere they are saying "Please don't take out your Note 7", it's just really…

Mario Serrafero: One last question, what can you tell us about Honor having in store for 2017. What are you guys planning in regards to your devices and your upgrades for the Honor 8, the Honor 5X, and the Honor Note series?

Zack Zhang: For the Honor devices, actually, there will be more devices coming of course. In China we have just launched the Honor 6X, as the successor of the Honor 5X. That will come to the US, the US market will be a strategic market for us. We'll try to bring more and more devices to the US market.

Mario Serrafero: And faster, right?

Zack Zhang: Yes, and as for the upgrade you mentioned, we will keep the commitment that we have made. We said that for two years we will update our phones. Especially with the Google security patches that a lot of people are worried about. You already tried the Honor 8, and can see that.

Mario Serrafero: Yes, in fact, just the other week I got an update just after the Big Android Barbeque, so it's definitely coming along nicely. One last thing, is there anything that you would like to say to the readers at XDA? To the enthusiasts and developers at XDA?

Zack Zhang: The main thing I would like to say is that I really appreciate everyone's feedback and opinions. I hope that they like us and we always believe that what the consumer recommends to us is extremely important. I hope that in the future, the Honor devices can be more adapted to everyone's tastes. I know that it's not possible to be everything for everybody, but we will try our best to be able to adapt to what people want and different local markets require. 

  Visit the Honor Hub on XDA!



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2gjzLWD
via IFTTT

Google Releases PhotoScan, an App to Digitize Your Photos

I've you've ever tried to digitize your old, printed photos then you know how much of a hassle it can be without access to a high resolution scanner. Since many people don't have a great scanner to handle digitizing photographs, they rely on their smartphone cameras. However, the glare and alignment difficulties often results in a sub-optimal version of your original photograph.

This is where Google's new app, PhotoScan, comes into play. It's a free application that is available right now on the Play Store. When you launch it, you're asked to align a photograph within a fixed rectangular frame, forcing the user to snap a picture of the photo at an appropriate angle and distance. After you take the first picture, you'll then be asked to move the camera over four different white dots while the app continues to capture more images. When you capture photos from all four spots, PhotoScan then runs a custom algorithm designed by Google to combine the photos based on landmarks and eliminate any glare.

Nat and Lo from Google take us behind the scenes to give us a look how PhotoScan works. The app uses computational photography to manipulate exactly what is being produced. PhotoScan removes the lighting glare by having you move the camera to each of those four dots. It will then map out some feature points (a single photo can have between 500 to 4,000 feature points) so the application can match those points from the images it captured.

I was playing with the application last night and it really does make it easier to digitize your old photographs. Oddly enough, Google Play says the application is not compatible with the Pixel XL or the Nexus 6P that I own. It's likely that Google is slowly rolling out the app to a limited number of devices at a time, but you can grab the APK for it right here.


Source: Google



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2f1pybw
via IFTTT

What are Your Thoughts on the OnePlus 3T?

After a series of leaks and whispers, the OnePlus 3T is finally here. As a standalone product, the OnePlus 3T packages some excellent hardware at a price that approaches the higher end of the affordable-flagship market, but still gives one of the best value packages as a flagship.

OnePlus has also answered a lot of questions and doubts on the OnePlus 3T and what it means for the OnePlus 3.

So, considering what we know so far, we ask you,

What do you think of the OnePlus 3T? Are you a OnePlus 3 owner, and if so, are you considering an upgrade? Is there any spec where the OnePlus 3T still needs to improve? Would you like to see other OEMs go in for a spec upgrade?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments below!



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2fFLlaq
via IFTTT