LightBlog

jeudi 3 décembre 2020

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra: Camera Shootout

Even though us phone geeks know there are more than a handful of brands that put out great premium smartphones, to the average consumer their only real options appear to still be Apple and Samsung. And so every year around this time, it’s worth comparing the latest iPhone against the latest Galaxy Note, because they represent the two most mainstream, widely-available premium phones for consumers around the world. With both Apple and Samsung claiming major camera breakthroughs for their respective top flagship, we figure it’s time for a camera shootout between the iPhone 12 Pro Max and the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra.

iPhone 12 Pro Max and Galaxy Note 20 Ultra

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra: Specification Comparison

Specifications Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
Build
  • Aluminum mid-frame
  • “Ceramic Shield” glass front and glass back
  • Aluminum mid-frame
  • Glass front and back
Dimensions & Weight
  • 160.8 x 78.1 x 7.4 mm
  • 226 grams (global)
  • 228 grams (US)
  • 164.8 x 77.2 x 8.1 mm
  • 208 grams
Display
  • Super Retina XDR OLED Display
  • 2,778 x 1,284
  • 6.9″ OLED Display
  • 1440 x 3088 resolution
  • Up to 120Hz refresh rate
SoC
  • Apple A14 Bionic
  • Snapdragon 865+ or Exynos 990
Storage Options
  • 128GB
  • 256GB
  • 512GB
  • 128GB
  • 256GB
  • 512GB
Battery & Charging
  • 3,687 mAh battery as per certification listings
  • 15W Wireless Charging with MagSafe
  • 7.5W Qi Wireless Charging
  • 4,500 mAh battery
  • 25W wired charging
  • 15W wireless charging
Security
  • 3D Face unlock
  • In-display fngerprint scanner
Rear Camera(s)
  • Primary: 12MP
  • Secondary:12MP, Ultra-wide angle
  • Tertiary: 12MP telephoto
  • Primary: 108MP, f/1.8, PDAF, Laser AF, OIS, 1/33″ sensor
  • Secondary: 12MP, f/2.2, ultra-wide-angle, 120° FoV
  • Tertiary: 12MP, f/3.0, 5x periscope zoom
  • Laser sensor
Front Camera(s)
  • 12MP, f/2.2
  • 10MP, f/2.2, 1.22µm
Port(s) Proprietary Lightning port USB-C
Connectivity
  • 5G: Sub 6GHz
    • mmWave for USA
  • Ultra-Wide Band (UWB)
  • Wi‑Fi 6 (802.11ax) with 2×2 MIMO
  • Bluetooth 5.0
  • 5G: Sub 6GHz
    • mmWave for USA
  • Ultra-Wide Band (UWB)
  • Wi‑Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Bluetooth 5.0
Software  iOS 14 One UI based on Android 11
Other Features
  • IP68
  • IP68
  • S-Pen

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra: Camera Hardware and Design

Over the past couple of years, Chinese phone brands such as Huawei and Xiaomi have been stuffing the spec sheet with more pixels, larger sensors and more lenses, while Samsung and Apple played it safe and stuck with camera hardware that seemed pedestrian on paper.

iPhone 12 Pro Max and Galaxy Note 20 Ultra

Both cameras are very good, but there are key differences in how each tackles image processing

2020 is the year both Apple and Samsung decided to join the camera hardware arms race. Samsung’s major push was made in the spring with the introduction of the Galaxy S20 Ultra, featuring a 108MP camera with a large image sensor, along with a Periscope zoom lens — and the Note 20 Ultra is a refinement of that system. Apple, meanwhile, released four iPhones this fall but claimed significant hardware improvements only for the largest iPhone 12 Pro Max model  — namely a “sensor shift” technology that resembles IBIS (in-body image stabilization) tech used in “real” cameras, and a larger image sensor.

iPhone 12 Pro Max and Galaxy Note 20 Ultra iPhone 12 Pro Max and Galaxy Note 20 Ultra iPhone 12 Pro Max and Galaxy Note 20 Ultra

In addition to the now standard wide, ultra-wide, zoom triple focal length set-up, each device has an additional sensor: the iPhone 12 Pro Max sports a LIDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) sensor which is mainly used for AR tech, but Apple also says it helps with focusing at night (spoiler alert: I compared the 12 Pro Max against the standard iPhone 12 without LIDAR and could not see a difference in focusing prowess).

Samsung, meanwhile, gave the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra a laser sensor to help with that 108MP sensor’s focusing, which was slightly unreliable on the Galaxy S20 Ultra (spoiler alert: the Note 20 Ultra’s auto-focusing improves from the S20 Ultra but it’s still a bit wonky compared to other top phones).

Nonetheless, both are very powerful systems, and they look the part too, with large, pronounced modules that grab attention. Around the front, the iPhone 12 Pro sports a 12MP camera placed with the Face ID facial scanning system — resulting in a huge notch — while Samsung uses a 10MP selfie lens in a tiny hole-punch cut-out. Anyway, enough with specs, let’s start the test.

Test 1: Main camera, day shot

Both cameras, unsurprisingly, are very, very good in this situation. But there are some key differences in how each tackle image processing. In general, Apple’s image processing is superior in finding the best balance in dynamic range, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra’s images are slightly sharper as it has more pixels to play with (even factoring in the pixel-binning that takes place). For example, the set below is a relatively challenging shot, with really harsh sunlight blasting through the lower half of the window, while the blackout curtains in the top half cast a deep shadow across the room and the human subject’s face.

iPhone 12 Pro Max camera in action Note 20 Ultra camera in action

Even without zooming in, we can see the iPhone 12 Pro Max’s image lights up the shadowed parts a bit better — without blowing out the harsh lights coming through the window.

iPhone 12 Pro Max camera in action iPhone 12 Pro Max camera in action

Zooming closer, we can see the actual paintings in the 12 Pro Max’s shot while the Note 20 Ultra’s shot is dim.

Photo samples of the iPhone 12 Pro Max and the Note 20 Ultra

iPhone 12 Pro Max (left) and Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (right).

Now, better lit doesn’t necessarily mean a better shot. One can argue the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra’s photo is moodier, more atmospheric. But what’s objective is that the Note 20 Ultra’s photo is slightly more detailed, sharper. See the difference when we zoom into the face mask and the book on the coffee table.

Note 20 Ultra and iPhone 12 Pro samples

iPhone 12 Pro Max (left); Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (right).

Moving onto another day shot, it’s mostly the same deal: the Galaxy Note 20 shot is slightly sharper, showing the texture of the tree’s leaves and pavement better, but slightly overexposes the clouds.

iPhone 12 sample Note 20 Ultra sample

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max (left) vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (right)

Another thing I noticed is that the iPhone 12 Pro Max has a faster, more responsive shutter — the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra’s shutter isn’t slow per se, but it does take an extra beat. Whenever I point both phones at moving cars and hit the shutter button at the same time, the vehicle is always further along in the shot in the Note 20 Ultra’s shot — because the photo was taken a split-second later than the 12 Pro Max’s.

iPhone 12 Pro Max photo Galaxy Note 20 Ultra sample

iPhone 12 Pro Max (left); Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (right).

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max (left) vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (right)

But Apple also tends to keep colors too natural, while Samsung isn’t afraid to make tweaks to produce what it thinks are more pleasing shots — and you know what, for the most part, I like Samsung’s color science better. Just look at how much more aesthetically pleasing the leaves look. They’re orange and vibrant on the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra’s image, dull and staid on the iPhone 12 Pro Max’s shot.

But photos during the day is easy stuff. Let’s move onto more challenging tests…

Test 2: Main camera, night or low light shot

The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra’s main camera sensor measures 1/1.33″, making it the second-largest sensor (the Huawei P40 Pro and Huawei Mate 40 Pro edges it out with a 1/1.28″) in smartphones. Apple did not reveal the exact size of its image sensor, but teardowns have revealed that it’s large by Apple standards, but still small compared to what Samsung and Huawei are rocking. But the Note 20 Ultra also needs more light than the iPhone 12 Pro Max because it has more pixels (108 million of them) to fill. Plus, as the Google Pixel 5 has proven, software smarts is arguably as important as hardware for low light performance.

This first set, although taken at night, barely qualifies as a low light shot, because Hong Kong streets have so many lights, but it’s still a hint of what’s to come as we go darker.

iPhone 12 Pro Max night shot Note 20 Ultra night shot

Both shots turned out very nicely, with mostly proper balance despite the myriad of light sources with a blend of shadowed, dark areas. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra’s color science tend to cool, resulting in less of a yellow hue that’s present in the iPhone 12 Pro Max’s shots. Technically, the 12 Pro Max’s colors are more accurate because there was a yellow-ish tint from the fluorescent street lights, but again, I like Samsung’s color science a tad better. If we zoom in, the Note 20 Ultra’s shot is sharper with less noise. This is a trend that will continue in this section.

iPhone 12 Pro Max (left); Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (right).

Moving on to a darker scene. The first thing I must mention is that the iPhone 12 Pro Max, like last year’s iPhone 11, turns on night mode by default as soon as the scene gets dark enough. You can turn off night mode on an iPhone, but it’s a two-step process. The point is Apple wants night mode to take over automatically without the user even noticing; whereas pretty much all Android phones still require you to manually select night mode. In the below set, the 12 Pro Max turned on night mode. I did not turn on night mode for then Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, yet the two shots turned out about evenly well-lit.

Perhaps because the iPhone 12 Pro Max needed to use computational tricks (night mode) to produce the shot whereas the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra could just snap the shot with its larger image sensor, Samsung’s shot is slightly superior when it comes to balance — the neon “Petix and chill” sign is a bit blown out on the 12 Pro Max.

This next set is even darker. While there is light coming through from behind the glass door (left side of the photo), the plant on the patio (right side of photo) was almost pitch black to my eyes. Since the iPhone 12 Pro Max turned on night mode, it beats the Note 20 Ultra’s regular shot.

To even the playing field, I took another shot with the Note 20 Ultra’s night mode on, and here it becomes much closer — the plant is still better lit in Apple’s photo, but it also blows out the light coming from inside the apartment.

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra — Test 3: Ultra-wide camera, day shot

Both the iPhone 12 Pro Max and Galaxy Note 20 Ultra sport very wide ultra-wide cameras with a field-of-view of 120-degree. In this first test, I took both in a moving cab in really quick point-and-shoot style, and the 12 Pro Max just completely nails the shot in terms of sharpness and exposure. The Note 20 Ultra blows out the light quite badly coming from outside the cab.

But I suppose this is because the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra needs longer to process a scene and produce a balanced shot, because when I took another set later in a still room, where I gave more time for the viewfinder to aim at the scene before snapping, the Note 20 Ultra finds much better balance. There was a bit of a green tint through the window in that room, which is accurately represented in the iPhone 12 Pro Max’s shot, but again, I like that Samsung decided to make changes and produce a shot with colors that are more visually appealing.

In terms of distortion correction or sharpness in the edges of the shot, both ultra-wide sensors are about even, so during the day at least, this really comes down to whether you like natural colors or punchier colors.

Test 4: Ultra-wide camera, night or low light shot

The real test for the ultra-wide camera is in low light situations because that’s where these sensors have historically struggled. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra’s ultra-wide has better hardware that is more suitable for light intake, with a 1/2.55″ sensor and an f/2.2 aperture, while the iPhone 12 Pro Max’s ultra-wide is a 1/3.6″ sensor with a f/2.4 aperture. Despite the fact that the iPhone 12 Pro Max turned on light mode automatically, the Note 20 Ultra’s shots are just better lit and sharper.

ultra-wide samples

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max (left) vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (right)

In moderately dark shots, both phones’ ultra-wide produce great shots — a clear step up from last year’s iPhone 11 phones or Galaxy Note 10 series.

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max (left) vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (right)

Test 5: Portrait/bokeh shot

The iPhone 12 Pro Max shoots portraits with a 2.5x telephoto lens, while the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra uses its main camera, which means if taken from the same spot, the 12 Pro Max’s portrait has a closer crop.

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max (left) vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (right)

Both phones can produce excellent edge detection with a natural creamy bokeh effect. I do find the iPhone 12 Pro Max’s bokeh blur to be slightly more realistic looking but that’s mostly subjective. However, if you zoom closer in the second set, you’ll see that the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra’s shot loses a lot of details on my face — likely because this was a challenging portrait against harsh backlight.

iPhone 12 Pro Max (left); Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (right).

iPhone 12 Pro Max (left); Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (right).

For inanimate objects, both do a solid job, but neither can rival what the Google Pixel 5 can do, as both Apple and Samsung’s phones usually require a couple of seconds to lock focus on an inanimate object. Overall, I like the iPhone 12 Pro Max’s portrait abilities by a hair.

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max (left) vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (right)

Test 6: Zoom shots

Despite all the hype Apple gave to its new telephoto lens, which offers a 2.5x optical zoom instead of the 2x Apple has used for years, this is still a lopsided win for Samsung because the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra uses Periscope zoom technology which is just superior to traditional telephoto lenses. It’s not just that the Note 20 Ultra can zoom up to 50x while the iPhone 12 Pro Max tops out at 12x, but even at 5x, 12x range, the Note 20 Ultra’s shots are just sharper and more detailed. The below set, for example, are both 5x shots.

And at 12x:

Phone 12 Pro Max, 12x zoom Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, 12x zoom Phone 12 Pro Max, 12x zoom Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, 12x zoom

At night, the same story repeats itself.

iPhone 12 Pro Max, 12x Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, 12x

Despite all the hype Apple gave its new telephoto lens for 2.5x zoom instead of the 2x zoom, this is still a lopsided win for Samsung

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra –Test 7: Selfies

As has been the case for years, Apple’s selfies are more realistic and natural when it comes to processing skin tones, while Samsung applies a beauty filter that smoothens and lightens skin. As someone with flawed skin, I often prefer Samsung’s handling, as it’s more flattering in smoothing out all my skin flaws, but I totally understand why some (or many) prefer the iPhone’s realistic approach.

Where the iPhone 12 Pro Max wins big is in selfies in low-light environment, because as is the case with all its other lenses, night mode turns on automatically. You don’t even have to think, just point and shoot. In the last sample, taken in a really dark patio, both selfies struggle with details and noise, but it’s particularly bad on the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra. Still, I’d take a small hole-punch cut-out over a notch any day.

iPhone 12 Pro Max Galaxy Note 20 Ultra iPhone 12 Pro Max Galaxy Note 20 Ultra iPhone 12 Pro Max Galaxy Note 20 Ultra

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max (left) vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (right)

Test 8: Video

The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra can shoot video in up to 8K resolution and it features other specialty modes like “Live Focus video,” which applies a bokeh effect in video form. Even if both of these work well — they do not — these are niche gimmicks anyway. The thing most consumers want in a video is great stabilization for moving videos, and proper exposure. On both fronts, the iPhone 12 Pro Max wins hands down over the Note 20 Ultra, with the lead widening at night.

Conclusion: Samsung wins the techie niche areas, Apple wins in areas that may matter more to average consumers

When it comes to main camera performance, it’s too close to call. I generally like the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra’s color science better, and images are slightly sharper if you really want to crop in, but Samsung’s phone also has a slight shutter lag and doesn’t handle dynamic range as well if not given enough time to process. The Note 20 Ultra then wins the zoom lens by miles while edging out another win in the ultra-wide sensor too.

    Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
    The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has one of the best screens and best cameras on the market. It's 108MP camera can produce sharp and brightly lit photos, while that Periscope zoom lens can get up to 50x.

However, the iPhone 12 Pro Max takes better portraits, selfies, and videos, and I’d argue that, to average consumers, these are more important than 12x zoom, or ultra-wide shots at night. I think if I have to pick a winner in this camera comparison — I’d give the win to the iPhone 12 Pro Max, by a hair.

    iPhone 12 Pro Max
    Apple's latest and biggest features a new camera hardware that includes a larger image sensor and a longer telephoto zoom lens. It's definitely one of the most capable camera system of the year.

Still, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra camera is really good — the most well-rounded camera system in Android.

The post Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra: Camera Shootout appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/2JwqQR9
via IFTTT

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, Note 10, and XCover Pro receive new updates with December 2020 security patches

Samsung hasn’t had the best track record of pushing monthly security updates to its devices in the past. However, the company has been doing a terrific job over the last few months. Samsung’s update schedule has improved to the extent that it’s now pushing the latest Android security patches to some of its devices even before Google officially publishes the corresponding Android Security Bulletin. For instance, even though Google hasn’t officially published the Android Security Bulleting for December 2020, the Galaxy S20 lineup, the Galaxy S20 FE, and the Galaxy S9 have already received the December 2020 patches. And it doesn’t seem like Samsung is stopping anytime soon, as the company has now released similar updates for three more devices — the Galaxy Z Fold 2, Galaxy Note 10, and Galaxy XCover Pro.

As per a recent post on Reddit, the company has started rolling out an update for the Galaxy Z Fold 2 (model number SM-F916B) with the software version F916BXXS1BTK1, and it brings the latest Android security patches to the device. The update is rolling out in several regions, including countries in Asia, Africa, and Europe.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 December 2020 patches

Similarly, a recent post on our Galaxy Note 10+ forums suggests that a similar update is rolling out to the Galaxy Note 10 lineup. The update (version N97xFXXS6DTK8) is rolling out to the Exynos versions of the Galaxy Note 10 and Galaxy Note 10+ (SM-970F and SM-975F) in Europe at the moment. Finally, the Galaxy XCover Pro (model number SM-G715FN) is also receiving a similar update (version G715FNXXS6ATK2) in Europe, which includes the Android security patches for December 2020.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, Galaxy Note 10, and Galaxy XCover Pro users in the aforementioned regions should be able to download the update on their devices by heading over to the Software update section in the device settings. In case the update isn’t available on your device yet, you can skip the wait and download the firmware package directly from Samsung’s update server using tools like Samloader and install it manually using a Windows PC. Alternatively, Galaxy Note 10+ users can grab the update package from the XDA Forums thread linked above.

The post Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, Note 10, and XCover Pro receive new updates with December 2020 security patches appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/3lARUvJ
via IFTTT

Apktool v2.5.0 adds better support for decoding apps built for Android 11

If you’re into reverse-engineering Android applications, then the name “Apktool” should ring a bell. Maintained by Connor Tumbleson AKA XDA Recognized Developer iBotPeaches, this open source tool allows you to disassemble Android application binary (known as APK) files, change something, and rebuild them. After a bit of a development hiatus, Apktool has now been freshly updated to version 2.5.0, with the new headline feature being “Android 11 support.”

In order to streamline things significantly on Android 11, the smali/baksmali backend of Apktool needs an upgrade. Not only the latest build addresses the issue, but it also comes with the necessary framework update. The error logging module has been revamped as well, so that users can get more done in less time without bothering about deciphering cryptic error messages. In addition, the update brings tons of patches to the Android Asset Packaging Tool (aapt/aapt2) to improve macOS compatibility and minimize the possibility of crashing during compilation.

You can view the full changelog of the update below:

  • [#2399#2397#2369#2167] Android 11 Support.
  • [#2006#1718] Upgraded smali/baksmali to v2.4.0.
  • [#2110#2053] Deprecate 32 bit operating systems.
  • [#2251] Fix thread crash with binary name collision.
  • [#2323] Fix compression on resources.arsc.
  • [#2333] Fix crash with empty files during compression. (Thanks peret)
  • [#2328#2364] Fix debug mode handling with aapt2. (Thanks Comnir)
  • [#2386#2217#2119] Fix handling XML files with $ in name.
  • [#2300] Fix NPE while disassembling manifest with no resource matching resId.
  • [#2438#1903] Fix aapt2 with dummy properties of bool(false) to ref(null).
  • [#2317#2188#1859] Fix non-standard namespaces in obfuscated manifests.
  • [#1945#2146] Fix NPE when finding referent of a missing resource.
  • [#2343] Fix error message when framework directory cannot be written.
  • [#2411] Add tests for classes[1-3].dex
  • [#1913] Added new list frameworks command.
  • [#2368] Added support for compileSdkVersion.
  • Updated response codes to properly be non-zero if invalid parameters passed. (Thanks Giszmo)
  • Updated license headers to reflect start date of project & remove javadoc style. (Thanks friederbluemle)
  • Added support for JAVA_HOME variable on Windows helper script. (Thanks vldmrrr)
  • Added support for SDK Codename “S”
  • Upgrade to gradle 6.4.1
  • Replaced TravisCI with GitHub Actions

If you haven’t already updated, just download the latest version using the links below and check out the install instructions for additional details. There is also a dedicated support thread on our forums for more info to get started.

Download Apktool: GitHub || Bitbucket


Source: Connor Tumbleson’s Blog

The post Apktool v2.5.0 adds better support for decoding apps built for Android 11 appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/33DYwmy
via IFTTT

Google Photos update adds a live wallpaper that cycles through your memories

In September last year, Google added a new Memories view in Google Photos to help users rediscover old photos and videos. Since its release, Google has tested a bunch of additional features for the Memories view, including an option to order photo prints, support for photo creations, and a new “Recent Highlights” album to showcase an “automatically curated album of your best photos.” While some of these features haven’t made it to the app so far, the latest Google Photos update brings yet another Memories-based feature to the app.

Google Photos version 5.22 just started rolling out on the Google Play Store, and it includes a new live wallpaper that cycles through your memories. As you can see in the attached screenshots, the new Memories live wallpaper can be found in the stock wallpaper picker. Selecting the wallpaper brings up a preview pane that showcases how your memories will appear on the home screen.

Google Photos Memories Live Wallpaper

If you like what you see, you can tap on the “Set wallpaper” button in the bottom right corner to apply the live wallpaper. The preview pane also has an “Open Photos” button to open Google Photos. However, opening the app doesn’t present any additional customization options for the live wallpaper at the moment. Furthermore, the preview window has a “Preview” checkbox in the top right corner, which hides the aforementioned buttons to display the wallpaper in full-screen view.

As mentioned earlier, the new live wallpaper is included in the latest Google Photos update. You can check if you’ve received the update by following the Play Store link below. In case you haven’t, you can download the latest Google Photos APK from APKMirror to get the new Memories live wallpaper on your device. I sideloaded the APK on my Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and I can confirm that the new live wallpaper feature works as intended.

Google Photos (Free, Google Play) →

The post Google Photos update adds a live wallpaper that cycles through your memories appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/2JvG09h
via IFTTT

Best Samsung Galaxy Phones For Any Budget Or Need (December 2020)

There’s a reason why Samsung is the world’s largest smartphone maker (by market share), with a loyal fanbase. The South Korean tech giant produces some of the most cutting-edge mobile tech in the world, but they also have a diverse range of products that fill other needs. So whether your budget is particularly tight, or if you want to splurge on the best money can buy, or you have specific usage habits that require a niche feature, there’s likely a Samsung phone that fits just what you need. Here’s our guide on the best Samsung Galaxy Phones to buy depending on your budget or need. If you want to look at more than just Samsung phones, then check out our guide to the best Android phones you can buy right now!

These are the best Samsung Galaxy Phones:

Best Overall: Samsung Galaxy S20

Samsung Galaxy S20+ Review

We understand that today’s top tier flagships are priced at a level higher than what most average consumers are willing, or able, to pay. For most people, they are better off buying something slightly older and perhaps a notch below the highest-end variant (the Ultras, Pros, Maxes). You’re still getting plenty of power but at a much better value.

Right now, the Galaxy S20 fits the description. At the time of this writing, the device is about 10 months old and overshadowed by the Galaxy Z Fold 2, Galaxy Z Flip, and Galaxy Note 20 series in Samsung’s pecking order, so there should be some great discounts if you look around. Despite that, the Galaxy S20 is still every bit a flagship, with among the best screen (Samsung’s Super AMOLED with Quad HD resolution and 120Hz refresh rate) and processor (Snapdragon 865) on the market. Best of all, this standard Galaxy S20, because it uses a 12MP sensor instead of the troubled 108MP, doesn’t suffer the focus issues of the Galaxy S20 Ultra.

    Galaxy S20
    By far one of the best smartphones that Samsung has ever made, the Galaxy S20 is every bit a flagship as its siblings, and packs plenty of power. Thanks to newer devices on the market and socially distant sales, you should be able to get the Galaxy S20 at a discounted price!

Best Value: Samsung Galaxy S20 FE

 

The relatively newer Galaxy S20 FE (Fan Edition) brings most of the goodness you just read in the previous paragraph, but with some concessions in exchange for a few hundred dollars off. You’re still getting a 120Hz Super AMOLED display (a bit larger at 6.5-inches), still getting Snapdragon 865, but the body is now crafted out of polycarbonate, and the telephoto camera has been downgraded from a 64MP to an 8MP that will likely just be serviceable. Still, the most important parts of a phone – processor, screen, and main camera – are still near top-notch here on this excellent flagship-like phone at much lower than flagship prices.

    Samsung Galaxy S20 FE
    The newest phone on this list, the S20 FE can be considered one of the best value offerings of 2020. You're getting almost a tip top flagship handset here with just a slight compromise such as plastic body and average telephoto camera.

Best that money can buy: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 review

The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is the most cutting edge smartphone in the world but to experience it comes with a cost: it retails for $2,000 usually and, despite its excellent built quality, is still going to be more fragile than everything else on this list by virtue of being a folding device.  However, if you are okay with those two compromises, you are in for a treat.

Everything from playing games to watching movies, typing long emails to multi-tasking, is better on the Fold 2 because of its large 7.6-inch screen. That Snapdragon 865+ and 120Hz refresh rate of the inside screen sure help matters. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 offers an experience unlike any other smartphone and is the phone and tablet combination in one device that you’ve been searching for.

    Galaxy Z Fold 2
    The most cutting edge phone of the year -- but it will cost you a pretty penny. However, if money is no object and you need to have the very best that Samsung offers, look no further than the Galaxy Z Fold 2. We love it, and so will you!

Best for those who want a stylus: Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra

samsung galaxy note 20 ultra review exynos 990

While the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is Samsung’s absolute top phone in terms of ambition and design, going by actually hardware component prowess, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is even better. It’s got a better main camera system headlined by a 108-megapixel camera, a “Space Zoom” periscope camera that can pull off crisp 5X shots, respectable 10X and all the way up to 50X. And its screen is the absolute best non-folding screen on the market, with a variable refresh rate that can go up to 120Hz for ultra fluidity, or lower for more static apps to save battery.

What makes the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra worth considering for many is the S-Pen, which in addition to being a pretty great stylus can now double as a remote control for hands-free photo taking or cycling through the phone’s UI. If you’re someone who needs to annotate documents, sign digital documents, or do the occasional sketches, the S-Pen is indispensable. Performance is zippy all around thanks to that Snapdragon 865+ processor and 12GB of RAM. This is the second most expensive phone on this list, however, at $1,300, and the boxy corners and huge 6.9-inch screen makes it tough to use for those with smaller hands.

    Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
    The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is the phone that has everything, including an S-Pen! It has every spec you can imagine – aside from a folding screen – and the S-Pen is a game-changer for those who need to be productive on the go.

Best for those who want a stylus… at a discount: Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Lite

galaxy note 10 lite

If you read the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra paragraph and found yourself interested in the S-Pen but turned off by the $1,300 price, last year’s Galaxy Note 10 Lite is perhaps worth a look. You’re still getting the S-Pen for all your scribbling needs; still getting a vibrant Super AMOLED display, it’s just smaller with rounded corners so it’s easier for smaller hands, and best of all, it’s 1/3 the price of the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra.

In terms of the cameras, you get a trio of 12MP sensors of the wide, ultra-wide, and telephoto varieties. The cameras here won’t come close to what the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra offers but are more than good enough, especially at its mid-tier price point. The 4,500 mAh battery ensures all-day endurance too, however, the processor here is the Exynos 9810 instead of Qualcomm’s Snapdragon, so don’t expect to play games at the highest graphic setting or the blazing-fast speeds you’ll get from the Snapdragon 865+ in the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra.

    Galaxy Note 10 Lite
    If you've decided you really want in on that S-Pen action but don't want to pay $1,000 or more, this is a worthy alternative from Samsung. Despite its shortcomings, the Galaxy Note 10 Lite still represents one of the most affordable ways to get the S-Pen experience.

Best for those annoyed by notches and cut-outs: Samsung Galaxy A80

If you find notches and “Infinity-O” hole-punch cutouts unsightly, then the Galaxy A80, with its completely uninterrupted display, is for you. This phone ditches the selfie camera entirely, instead of using an elevating, spinning camera module that flips the main camera system around during selfie use. The rising and flipping camera module is fast and reliable, and while the 48MP main camera, 8MP ultra-wide camera, and TOF sensor are solid but unspectacular as a main camera system, for selfies it’s among one of the most feature-packed systems.

There’s a Snapdragon 730 processor and a good 1080 x 2400 AMOLED panel too. But the optical in-display fingerprint scanner is a bit slow, however. And the device is about one and a half years old. But we’re nitpicking now — this is still an excellent mid-range device.

    Galaxy A80
    If you're tired of notches and hole-punches and prefer your screen uninterrupted and symmetrical, this is one of the few options available. The clever elevating and spinning camera mechanism will attract plenty of attention in the public and means your selfies should be better than on most phones as it uses the main camera!

Best for those with with small pockets: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip

Galaxy Z Flip

By “small pocket”, we don’t mean a lack of funds; but rather we literally mean pockets without a lot of space, like women’s jeans, for example. The Galaxy Z Flip is perfect for those because its clamshell design allows it to fold up and become a petite device with rough dimensions of a coaster. Then unfolded, it’s a thin, sleek smartphone with thin bezels and a capable dual-camera system consisting of a 12MP main and 12MP ultra-wide-camera, as well as a 10MP selfie camera.

Just like the Galaxy Z Fold 2, the hinge locks in place at various angles which offers unique use cases, such as putting it on a table for hands-free video calls. Depending on your needs, this phone either comes in an older, but cheaper, Snapdragon 855+ or the newer but pricier Snapdragon 865+ version. The latter will bring speedier performance and support for 5G, but the non-5G version is still plenty powerful if you want to save $200.

    Galaxy Z Flip
    The Galaxy Z Flip is ideal for those who don't like how big phones have become, and the bulk it leaves in your pocket. This, along with the Fold 2, represents Samsung's two most ambitious products currently. Unlike the Z Fold 2, the Z Flip offers the smartphone experience everyone loves in a considerably more manageable form factor.

Best for battery life: Samsung Galaxy M51

Galaxy M51

If you find yourself constantly having low battery anxiety with your smartphone, the Galaxy M51 should leave you at ease. It has a gigantic 7,000 mAh battery that is guaranteed to go at least two full days on a single charge, likely three, as our own review found. This large battery, as expected, makes the phone quite a bulky device, weighing 213g and measuring 9.5mm in thickness. But in our testing, we still found it ergonomically friendly thanks to the evenly distributed weight and the subtle curvature of the backside.

You also have a large 6.7-inch 1,080 x 2,340 screen, and a quad-camera system headlined by a 64MP shooter and a 12MP ultra-wide-angle camera, as well as a pair of 5MP macro and depth sensors. With the Snapdragon 730G on board, you have enough processing power for all your smartphone tasks.

    Galaxy M51
    Never suffer from battery anxiety again with this beastly device with a 7000 mAh battery. Despite the size, Samsung's done a great job making this comfortable to hold and use.

Best Samsung for those who want 5G on a budget: Samsung Galaxy A71 5G

Samsung Galaxy A71 5G launches in the US this week for $599

Who said only pricey flagships can support 5G? Powered by a Snapdragon 765G, the A71 has the modem ready to support 5G connectivity while keeping prices reasonably in the mid-range. A 6.7-inch, 2,400 x 1,080 Super AMOLED panel, a quad-camera system, and a 4,500 mAh battery keeps the device up to 2020 standards, although the plastic back feels a notch below premium. Still, you’re getting next-gen connection speeds and a very capable 64MP camera that excels during the day and holds its own at night.

    Galaxy A71 5G
    The Galaxy A71 may be priced in the mid-tier level, but you're still getting a large Super AMOLED screen, four cameras, and 5G connectivity.

What’s your favorite Samsung Galaxy phone from this list, and are there any others you think we should add? Let us knows in the comments below!

The post Best Samsung Galaxy Phones For Any Budget Or Need (December 2020) appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/3clcBZe
via IFTTT

Vivaldi Browser for Android adds an option to clear browsing data on exit

Vivaldi, a Chromium-based browser that offers additional customization options, has introduced a new update on Android focused on increased privacy.

One of the main features of Vivaldi 3.5 is the ability to clear browsing data on exit. Users now have control over what data is retained every time they exit the browser. The update allows users to remove:

  • Browsing history: Clears history and autocompletions in the Address Bar.
  • Cookies and site data: Lets users sign out of most sites.
  • Cached images and files: Frees up cache memory.
  • Close open tabs.

These features are turned off by default. However, you can easily turn the setting on by going to Settings > Privacy > Clear session browsing data on exit. The company claims that not only does the feature provide users with a more private browsing experience, but it also makes the experience speedier overall.

Vivaldi 3.5 on Android also includes WebRTC (Web Real-time Communication) leak protection. Going forward, users can disable WebRTC broadcast IP, which won’t leak your user IP address to websites when using a VPN. According to Vivaldi, disabling the feature could result in issues related to performance and site incompatibility for the WebRTC based applications. However, Vivaldi still wanted to offer users the option.

Finally, Vivaldi 3.5 on Android provides users with more sorting options for notes and bookmarks. Users can now sort notes based on different criteria like title, the date of creation, or even by content. Notes can also be reordered manually. The same sorting options apply to bookmarks as well, which can be synced wherever you use Vivaldi.

Vivaldi on Android has received a number of new features throughout the year, including a recent update in September that introduced configurable address and tab bars and full-page blocking. Vivaldi 3.5 for Android is available now.

Vivaldi Browser with ad blocker: fast & private (Free, Google Play) →

The post Vivaldi Browser for Android adds an option to clear browsing data on exit appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/2I7KpyA
via IFTTT

mercredi 2 décembre 2020

Files by Google 1.0.345 prepares to add a Trash folder for restoring deleted files

Back in June this year, Google released a video detailing changes to storage access in Android 11. The video highlighted a new “trashing” mechanism that would allow apps to trash files instead of deleting them, which would essentially give users a chance to recover trashed files within a 30-day period. But we’re yet to see an app make use of this new trashing mechanism, even though Android 11 has been out for a few weeks. However, that might change soon, as Google is now preparing to add a Trash folder to the Files by Google app.

The latest version of Files by Google (v. 1.0.345) started rolling out on the Play Store today. In terms of user-facing changes, the update brings improvements to the audio player for enhanced background playback, file grouping for an easier browsing experience, and screenshot cleaning to help users detect and delete old screenshots.

Along with these changes, the update also includes new strings that point towards a new menu item called “Trash” to help users restore deleted files. Our Editor-in-Chief, Mishaal Rahman, managed to enable this new feature manually, and here’s what it looks like:

Files by Google Trash Folder 2 Files by Google Trash Folder 2

As you can see in the attached screenshots, the new “Trash” option can be accessed by tapping on the hamburger menu icon in the top left corner. Tapping on the option opens up a new page that lists all deleted files in reverse chronological order. At the top of the page, you can see a hint that states: “Any file that has been in Trash for 30 days will be permanently deleted.” The page also includes two buttons at the bottom to restore and permanently delete selected files. Additionally, the page has a button in the top right corner to toggle between list and grid view.

While these screenshots give us a good look at the Trash feature, it’s worth noting that the feature hasn’t rolled out for anyone just yet. We verified this by sideloading the latest Files by Google APK on a ZenFone 7 Pro running Android 11, and we couldn’t see the Trash option. It’s also worth noting that the feature should be available on devices running older versions of Android, but we’ve only tested it on Android 11 at the moment.

Files by Google: Clean up space on your phone (Free, Google Play) →

The post Files by Google 1.0.345 prepares to add a Trash folder for restoring deleted files appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/3oaIU1Y
via IFTTT